Why does J. A. Fodor think that there must be a language of thought Is Essay

wherefore does J. A. Fodor think that there must be a language of thought Is he right - undertake ExampleSpecifically, Fodor advanced a notion of a language of thought. Fodors Language of Thought surmisal (LOTH) states that the thought process occurring in the sound judgement is a symbolical system that parallels a language in structure. Jerry Fodors presented LOTH in his aptly titled book The Language of Thought (Fodor 1975). Through an exam the major plat course of actions of the LOTH hypothesis, as well as prominent criticisms, this essay examines the extent that Fodor is successful in articulating the existence of a language of thought. Language of Thought Philosophers have formulated LOTH by considering the multiplicity of thoughts, or propositional attitudes. One can identify propositional attitudes in sentences like A wishes that B, or A thinks that B, or A intends that B. A is the subject of attitude, B is the sentence, and that B is the proposition or the object of th e attitude. If we say that C stands for verbs like wishes, thinks, and intends, then the propositional attitude sentences would take the form A Cs that B. Therefore, LOTH can be considered as a hypothesis that features how we create propositional attitudes in our psychic language, and how we relate our thought and cerebration with them. Our abstract thinking takes place in a psychological representation of language-like structure however, this is not direct representation of spoken language. Rather, this language of thought is a form of representation where the human mind perceives concepts and symbolizes them rather than using words for those concepts. Hence, the mind uses internal forms of representation, contrastive from tralatitious linguistic words, to represent these concepts. Still, these symbols combine to form mental sentences, called the propositional attitudes, which are consistent with the grammatical rules of language. This conceptual thinking has a computational nature that extracts thinking from processing the series of mental symbols according to algorithms. figural Theory Jerry Fodor specifically implements representational theory in supporting his position (Fodor 1987). According to representational theory, thinking occurs in the form of symbols that are actually the propositional attitudes described earlier (Fodor 1987). While Fodor argues that propositional attitudes should be represented not only as symbols but also as a language, he believes this language of thought is different from spoken and written languages like English, French or German (Fodor 1987). Consider the following I acquiret want to eat ladyfingers, so Id better tell mom to reconcile me French fries. According to representational theory, there is a state of a section of this individuals headway that represents his or her unwillingness to eat ladyfingers (Fodor 1987). There is another section of this individuals sense that represents his or her way of avoiding lad yfingers namely, to tell their mom to cook something else (Fodor 1987). Thirdly, there is a small piece of brain circuitry that is linking these two states and instigating an action (Fodor 1987). LOTH asserts that the representation of the decision in this example here has to be structured. That is, it has to be structured just like a sentence articulating that decision. Fodors LOTH further states that the structure of symbolic representation in the mind and the linguistic representation of that symbolic representation must be related. That is, the structure of the brain state matching the decision of eating French fries will be identical to the structure of the sentence articulating the decision. One considers another example There is a suspicion crossing my mind that a rat is under my bed